Maxine the Progressive Wants Revenge

Maxine the Progressive Wants Revenge

 

Who will win overall in the midterm Congressional elections on November 6? The Democrats? The Republicans?

What do you think? Please share your thoughts in the comments section below.

Nate Silver and FiveThirtyEight.com forecast an 85% chance that the Democrats will win the House.

A vote for a Democrat is a vote for Nancy Pelosi and Maxine Waters to run Congress.

Nancy Pelosi wants to be Speaker again while Maxine Waters also has grand plans.

You can watch Waters’ speech at a Black Women Network breakfast in Los Angeles below, but, first, here are a few highlights.

Waters was very specific about her role in Congress should the Democrats take control. She also made what appears to be an impossible campaign promise:

“First of all, if we take back the House, most of the members of the Congressional Black Caucus will be chairs of the committees of the Congress of the United States of America.”

In the House, there are 20 permanent committees while there appear to be 48 members of the Congressional Black Caucus. It seems her math is a bit fuzzy. Perhaps it has been so long since she was in school, she has forgotten basic logic and arithmetic!

Waters’ next comments were less about governing than they were about what she might consider retribution and revenge against the financial industry:

“I will be the first African American, the first woman, to chair the powerful Financial Services Committee. That’s all of Wall Street, that’s all the insurance companies, that’s all the banks.”

“I have not forgotten you foreclosed on our houses. I have not forgotten that you undermined our community. I have not forgotten that you sold us those exotic products, had us sign on the line for junk and for mess that we could not afford. And in doing that I have people who are homeless who have never gotten back into a home. What am I gonna do to you? What I am gonna do to you is fair. I am gonna do to you what you did to us.”

Waters ended her speech with a call for the election of progressives nationwide:

“Let’s send a message, not only in the State of California, that we want progressive legislators who are concerned about our blight, who are going to work with us, who are going to look at the opportunities to deal with investment in our potential. I want you to vote so that the message is not only clear but it is a lasting message.”

A vote for Democrats is a vote for Maxine Waters, regardless what state you live in.

Keep Maxine out of House leadership. It is not too late to spread the word!

 

It’s Election Day in Ohio

It’s Election Day in Ohio

It’s election day in Ohio.  On the ballot today, Ohio voters will decide whether or not to amend its constitution to allow the legal production and sale of marijuana.

So, what’s the big deal – pot is already legal in Colorado and Washington, it’s only a matter of time before decriminalization spreads throughout the country, right?

Well, there’s an added twist to the ballot measure in Ohio.  If legalized, marijuana will be grown only on the ten farms named specifically in the ballot measure and no others.  Because of the constitutional nature of the ballot measure, no other growers will ever be allowed.  What’s even more interesting is that the owners of the ten farms, who include pseudo-celebrity Nick Lachey, athletes Oscar Robertson and Frostee Rucker, a Texas auto dealer, and even great-great-grandnephews of President William Howard Taft, created and financed the entire ballot initiative. 

The Washington Post reports that each of the ten ownership groups was required to front $4 million to underwrite the ballot measure and was then expected to fund $10 million more to purchase land and get the farms up and running.

It is estimated that the profits to these corporate-owned marijuana magnates will be in the billions of dollars.  Annually.

What?

What we have here is a small group of “concerned citizens,” under the auspices of legalizing marijuana for the masses, creating a ballot measure that amends the Ohio constitution and allows only those who created and funded the measure to actually sell the marijuana, thus turning an initial investment of $14 million into profits in the billions of dollars.

This measure is less about legalization of pot than it is buying into a state constitution for profit!

Is this government for the people or government for the few?  Is this government for the individual or for the corporation?  It is outrageous that a few wealthy individuals can amend a state constitution solely for purposes of profit.

You should be outraged if you oppose corporate intrusion into government affairs.

You should be outraged even if you support decriminalization of marijuana, as the creators of this measure care not a whit about legalization, but solely about corporate profits.

Interestingly, the promise of this measure on the ballot spawned another ballot question (Ballot Measure 2) that would prohibit constitutionally granted monopolies and oligopolies, including any authorized in the November 3, 2015 election.  If No. 2 passes, No. 3, in theory, even if approved, will not take effect, likely setting up long, expensive court battles.  But, with billions of dollars at stake, what’s a lawsuit or two?

Nick Lachey took to YouTube in an ad supporting passage of Ballot Measure 3 by stating that he is from Ohio and cares very deeply for the people of his state.  He claims that passage of the measure will create jobs, reinvigorate the economy and provide safety to Ohio communities.  Funny how he neglects to mention the potential for billions of dollars in revenue he and his cohorts will see if the measure passes.  You can watch that video here.

What do you think?  Is marijuana legalization so important to supporters that they are willing to overlook one of their other grand causes, fighting “big business” and what is called “corporate welfare,” just so they can get high legally?

HTML Snippets Powered By : XYZScripts.com